nanog mailing list archives
RE: Port scanning legal
From: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol () NorthShoreTechnologies net>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 18:12:55 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Roeland Meyer wrote:I've pinged IP addrs that I later found out were MIL addrs. Nothing happened. Duh!Cool. Care to portscan a couple .mil /16's and get back to me?
Dan is apparently suggesting that scanning *an* IP and scanning a /16 worth of IP's are one and the same action... -- Steve Sobol, BOFH, President 888.480.4NET 866.DSL.EXPRESS 216.619.2NET North Shore Technologies Corporation http://NorthShoreTechnologies.net JustTheNet/JustTheNet EXPRESS DSL (ISP Services) http://JustThe.net mailto:sjsobol () NorthShoreTechnologies net Proud resident of Cleveland, OH
Current thread:
- Re: Port scanning legal, (continued)
- Re: Port scanning legal Stephen Sprunk (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Matthew S. Hallacy (Dec 20)
- RE: Port scanning legal Mark Borchers (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Roeland Meyer (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Dan Hollis (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal L. Sassaman (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Majdi S. Abbas (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Dan Hollis (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Steven J. Sobol (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Patrick Evans (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Andrew Brown (Dec 20)
- Re: Port scanning legal Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)