nanog mailing list archives

RE: Port scanning legal


From: Mathew Butler <mbutler () tonbu com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 18:17:44 -0800


Great, so you're suggesting punishing good locksmiths or windowmen.

-Mat Butler

-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Kuhtz [mailto:ck () arch bellsouth net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 4:35 PM
To: mdevney () teamsphere com
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Port scanning legal



On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 04:26:33PM -0800, mdevney () teamsphere com wrote:
I do not understand why people get so uppity about a scan.  Let's be real
here, a simple portscan is about equivalent to walking along a sidewalk
and checking out the houses for open windows and doors.  And about as
harmful.

What is harmful is what sometimes comes after that.  (Not always; not
usually; not even half the time I'd bet.)  But the only damage a portscan
does is a few packets over your network and maybe 4M of logs (depending on
how you're logging).  When writing and enforcing laws, it's important to
punish what's harmful, not what may be harmful.  Or else looking at houses
as you walk down the street may be illegal.

I do think there is a difference between looking at houses and windows 
from the street and walking up to them and rattling the door and windows to 
see if it they are locked or determining what model lock, door or window
is used etc.

Current thread: