nanog mailing list archives
Re: Port scanning legal
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:29:30 -0500
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 11:15:17AM -0800, Roeland Meyer wrote:
ping!
That, too. Better lock me up; I can't count the number of times I've nmap-ed somebody just to find out what OS they were using, either for personal curiosity, or as part of an argument.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Port scanning legal, (continued)
- Re: Port scanning legal Deepak Jain (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Leo Bicknell (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal mdevney (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Christian Kuhtz (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Todd Suiter (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Stephen Sprunk (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Matthew S. Hallacy (Dec 20)
- RE: Port scanning legal Mark Borchers (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Roeland Meyer (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Dan Hollis (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal L. Sassaman (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Majdi S. Abbas (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Dan Hollis (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Steven J. Sobol (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Patrick Evans (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Andrew Brown (Dec 20)