nanog mailing list archives
Re: Port scanning legal
From: "Stephen Sprunk" <ssprunk () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:55:58 -0600
Thus spake "Jeff Wheat" <jeff () cetlink net>
Isn't that just sweet... So in a nutshell it is *not* illegal for kiddies to port scan a network looking for vulnerabilities. It would seem to me that such scans would impair the integrity of ones networks, or am I just smoking crack?
If the scans don't disrupt system operation (they're usually designed not to), how would it impair network integrity? To use (yet another) bad analogy, does a burglar walking through a parking lot checking for unlocked cars commit a crime? It's only a crime to steal/vandalize the cars.
Jeff CETLink.Net
S | | Stephen Sprunk, K5SSS, CCIE #3723 :|: :|: Network Design Consultant, GSOLE :|||: :|||: New office: RCDN2 in Richardson, TX .:|||||||:..:|||||||:. Email: ssprunk () cisco com
Current thread:
- RE: Port scanning legal, (continued)
- RE: Port scanning legal Patrick Evans (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal John Fraizer (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Alex Rubenstein (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Deepak Jain (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Leo Bicknell (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal mdevney (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Christian Kuhtz (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Todd Suiter (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Dan Hollis (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal L. Sassaman (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Majdi S. Abbas (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Dan Hollis (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Steven J. Sobol (Dec 19)