Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation
From: "J.A. Terranson" <measl () mfn org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:03:19 -0500 (CDT)
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Jason Coombs wrote:
J.A. Terranson wrote:On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Jason Coombs wrote: *millions* of copies of these "secrets" in general circulation. Nobody can assert with a straight face that anything about Lynn's presentation is not completely and totally within the public view - and irretrievably so.Just because you have a copy doesn't mean the document is in public view. The infowarrior.org URL no longer provides a copy of the trade secrets to those who seek them, so the effort to control distribution is working. Anyone who complies with the court order will delete their copy of the document and forget what they have read.
I'm not talking about Infowarrior, nor am I discussing one copy. Hint: I didn't get my copy from Infowarrior. Nor have I seen any "order".
You are making an argument that the legal system doesn't work just because you can disregard it at your own peril. That's nonsensical.
Not at all, I'm stating the obvious: this is plain public view because it's "controlled distribution" failed on a massive scale which is irretrieveable on it's face. There are too many copies for even an attempt to fake it. -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin () mfn org 0xBD4A95BF I like the idea of belief in drug-prohibition as a religion in that it is a strongly held belief based on grossly insufficient evidence and bolstered by faith born of intuitions flowing from the very beliefs they are intended to support. don zweig, M.D. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Russell Smoak (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Daniel (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Tony Montana (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation J.A. Terranson (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Jason Coombs (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation J.A. Terranson (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Jason Coombs (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation J.A. Terranson (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Jason Coombs (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation J.A. Terranson (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Jason Coombs (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation J.A. Terranson (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Daniel (Jul 29)
- RE: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversialCisco Security Presentation Lyal Collins (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Frank Knobbe (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation J.A. Terranson (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial CiscoSecurity Presentation Georgi Guninski (Jul 30)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversialCiscoSecurity Presentation Geo. (Jul 30)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation J.A. Terranson (Jul 29)