Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation
From: "J.A. Terranson" <measl () mfn org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:51:01 -0500 (CDT)
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Jason Coombs wrote: <cutting to the chase>
Now, if RC4 had never been used to create a product and had been kept as a trade secret, and that secret had been published, then it would not have become, automatically, an unencumbered algorithm that could be used by anyone with impunity. There being no way other than theft of trade secret for a third party to come to know the algorithm, had a court order been obtained to halt the spread of the secret the algorithm itself could very well have been kept as protectable intellectual property until such time as the company that enjoyed a commercial advantage through preservation of their RC4 trade secret had concluded the public distribution of a product that somebody else could have reverse engineered.
The problem here is essentially one of mass distribution. There are now *millions* of copies of these "secrets" in general circulation. Nobody can assert with a straight face that anything about Lynn's presentation is not completely and totally within the public view - and irretrievably so. -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin () mfn org 0xBD4A95BF "A stock broker is someone who handles your money until its all gone." Diana Hubbard (of Scientology fame) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Russell Smoak (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Daniel (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Tony Montana (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation J.A. Terranson (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Jason Coombs (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation J.A. Terranson (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Jason Coombs (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation J.A. Terranson (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Jason Coombs (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation J.A. Terranson (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Jason Coombs (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation J.A. Terranson (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Daniel (Jul 29)
- RE: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversialCisco Security Presentation Lyal Collins (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation Frank Knobbe (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial Cisco Security Presentation J.A. Terranson (Jul 29)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial CiscoSecurity Presentation Georgi Guninski (Jul 30)
- Re: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversialCiscoSecurity Presentation Geo. (Jul 30)