Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: Network scanning


From: Jason Armstrong <jarmstrong () technicacorp com>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 08:32:41 -0400


Remember that MAC addresses can be spoofed.



-----Original Message-----
From: Rory [mailto:nazgul () csn ul ie] 
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 6:23 PM
To: netsec novice
Cc: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: Network scanning


for the wireless stuff I would just do mac filtering, any host that is not
in the list of mac address is not allowed to join the wireless network. Of
course the network traffic can still be sniffed using any laptop but you can
just encrypt the traffic over wireless as you suggested. The mac filtering
is something easy to setup and makes sure you don't end up handing out
access to the network to some dude out in in the parking lot.

AS for the other stuff i'm not too sure as SNMP is not something I have
used, running a snort box in the network checking for scanning activity is
also a good precaution that way you are also guarding against any unhappy
employee's looking to make your job harder.

On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, netsec novice wrote:

Are there tools out there that would allow system administrators to be 
notified when a new workstation attaches to a network?  I'm thinking 
both wireless and ethernet in this case.  SNMP maybe?  I am in a 
credit union environment and my concern is that someone would be able 
to steal an existing jack or a jack that is not physically protected 
but live and be able to capture traffic or do reconaissance.  We don't 
have Wireless access at this point but may look to it in the future.  
My only thought in that case would be to encrypt all traffic since 
wireless security is a bit scary at this point.  Any ideas?

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: