Re: Network scanning

[Bradley Adams <bradley.adams () cas-inc com>]

In-Reply-To: <Law15-F99qpb65CsVGs00036c5c () hotmail com>

I just might have the answer http://www.dameware.com This is a very cool 
program that does an extremely large amount of network managment compaired 
to its price.

l8tr
Bradley Adams
bradley.adams () cas-inc com

> Received: (qmail 30593 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2003 22:02:22 -0000
> Received: from outgoing2.securityfocus.com (205.206.231.26)
>  by mail.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2003 22:02:22 -0000
> Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (lists.securityfocus.com 
[205.206.231.19])
>       by outgoing2.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with QMQP
>       id 4255A8F3DF; Thu,  7 Aug 2003 16:02:38 -0600 (MDT)
> Mailing-List: contact security-basics-help () securityfocus com; run by ezmlm
> Precedence: bulk
> List-Id: <security-basics.list-id.securityfocus.com>
> List-Post: <mailto:security-basics () securityfocus com>
> List-Help: <mailto:security-basics-help () securityfocus com>
> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:security-basics-unsubscribe () securityfocus com>
> List-Subscribe: <mailto:security-basics-subscribe () securityfocus com>
> Delivered-To: mailing list security-basics () securityfocus com
> Delivered-To: moderator for security-basics () securityfocus com
> Received: (qmail 31671 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2003 14:44:16 -0000
> X-Originating-IP: [216.229.170.227]
> X-Originating-Email: [netsec9 () hotmail com]
> From: "netsec novice" <netsec9 () hotmail com>
> To: security-basics () securityfocus com
> Subject: Network scanning
> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 20:51:14 +0000
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
> Message-ID: <Law15-F99qpb65CsVGs00036c5c () hotmail com>
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Aug 2003 20:51:14.0482 (UTC) FILETIME=
[A4199920:01C35D25]
> Are there tools out there that would allow system administrators to be 
> notified when a new workstation attaches to a network?  I'm thinking both 
> wireless and ethernet in this case.  SNMP maybe?  I am in a credit union 
> environment and my concern is that someone would be able to steal an 
> existing jack or a jack that is not physically protected but live and be 
> able to capture traffic or do reconaissance.  We don't have Wireless 
access 
> at this point but may look to it in the future.  My only thought in that 
> case would be to encrypt all traffic since wireless security is a bit 
scary 
> at this point.  Any ideas?
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------