Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: WIRELESS THEFT
From: James Dennis <james () firstaidmusic com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:19:56 -0500
This is not correct. Under current law the potential for money to be made is the loss. It's the same way the RIAA goes after file sharing companies. If someone has the mp3's, they probably won't buy the cd now (under their logic), so now there is a lost potential purchase. -James On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:36:55 -0500 Orion Robillard <orion () advanced-workflow com> wrote:
The only problem with the outside movie/concert analogy is that watching a move or listening to a concert is a purely passive activity and results in no (direct) loss of money to the concert/movie provider. Connecting to a wireless network (assuming you want to surf not just sniff) requires you to become an active participant. You could claim that you were just broadcasting random packets into space and it just so happened that the random packets you sent established a connection with your neighbors network. However you will be using bandwidth and that means money out of pocket for your 'host'. I would say as long as you aren't causing more then a reasonable amount of traffic and you aren't breaking even the simplest of locks, you don't have much to worry about. -----Original Message----- From: Jay D. Dyson [mailto:jdyson () treachery net] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 3:18 PM To: Security-Basics List Subject: Re: WIRELESS THEFT *** PGP Signature Status: good *** Signer: Jay D. Dyson <jdyson () treachery net> (Invalid) *** Signed: 10/16/2002 3:17:55 PM *** Verified: 10/17/2002 2:24:37 PM *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Amit P. Gandre wrote:Can someone tell me if there are any laws regarding wireless theft? One of the apartment complexes near mine has free wireless connections offered to their residents. Now, my computer happens to catch that signal. Now, is that illegal. If so, how should I go about dealing with this issue.This is one of those large grey areas in which technological evolution has far outpaced the law. As a consequence, anything you read on this forum will be the idle musings and personal opinions of the laity. With that in mind, I'd recommend you consult with an attorney about the actual legalities. That said, here's how I see it: the service is offered for free to qualified individuals, but it is disseminated in such a way that its availability exceeds its boundaries. Sort of like an outside movie or music concert. It's not held for the outsider's enjoyment, but the outsider can see and hear it from their living room window. With that sort of perspective, there is no harm nor foul. It's simple spillover. There is also the view that if you receive something you didn't order, then it is yours for free and you may do with it as you wish. This is the law of the land regarding packages received via the U.S. postal service. Again, under this perspective, there is no harm nor foul and the sender must eat the loss. However, there is yet another perspective that would view your use of those signals as Unauthorized Access (nevermind that there may well be absolutely no authorizing authentication in place). You're not one of the intended recipients of the signal and your use constitutes unauthorized (and thus illegal) access of a computer network. (This is where the media steps in and calls you a "computer whiz kid" and "genius hacker" simply because you actually read the freaking manual and know how to use your technology.) Speaking only for myself and not recommending this to anyone else, I'd probably ride that signal while it lasts and argue that the open signal was brought to me when I did not request it and thus it is free. If the nearby building wants to lock it down so I can't use it, then that's fine. But until then, they can have my wireless NIC when they pry it from my cold dead hands. ;) -Jay ( ( _______ )) )) .--"There's always time for a good cup of coffee"--. >====<--. C|~~|C|~~| (>------ Jay D. Dyson -- jdyson () treachery net ------<) | = |-' `--' `--' `- Your security is no joke. Well...okay, it is. -' `------' *** END PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
Current thread:
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Eugene Chai (Oct 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Mike Curry (Oct 17)
- Re: WIRELESS THEFT alex hajii (Oct 17)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Trevor Cushen (Oct 17)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Orion Robillard (Oct 17)
- Re: WIRELESS THEFT James Dennis (Oct 18)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Ashcraft, Brian S (Contractor) (Oct 17)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Jason Kohles (Oct 18)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Jay DeSotel (Oct 18)
- Re: WIRELESS THEFT Ishmann (Oct 17)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT khayes (Oct 17)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Högman, Lars (Oct 18)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Orion Robillard (Oct 18)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Merrell, Sam (Oct 18)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Brett Hiscock (Oct 18)
- RE: WIRELESS THEFT Alaric Darconville (Oct 18)
(Thread continues...)