Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Another new worm???
From: BlueBoar () THIEVCO COM (Blue Boar)
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:05:11 -0700
sigipp () WELLA COM BR wrote:
I only expect having no mails here which could already do some harm without even opening it. This would make me really angry. But luckily we have a moderator here.
Sorry, already blown it on that count once (long filename vuln nailed some Eudora users), and I've sent through a trojan in a less than inert form before as well, by mistake. I *do* make an effort to be considerate, but I also clearly screw up. I won't nail you on purpose, but I might easily do it by mistake. Caveat subscriber. Be careful which MUA you use, and learn enough of the POP protocol to delete the offending e-mail via telnet if you need to. BB
Current thread:
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault, (continued)
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault Jeff Bachtel (Jun 23)
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault Philip Rowlands (Jun 23)
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault Bluefish (Jun 24)
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault Jim Kinney (Jun 24)
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault Blue Boar (Jun 24)
- Different attack vector - PXE-2.0 protocol Ollie Whitehouse (Jun 25)
- Spoofed FTP connections John Scimone (Jun 25)
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault Jason Storm (Jun 24)
- Keyboard recording Martin M Samson (Jun 21)
- Re: Another new worm??? Blue Boar (Jun 21)
- Re: Another new worm??? Steve Mosher (Jun 22)
- disclosure and risk to list subscribers (Re: Another new worm???) Mark Rafn (Jun 22)
- Re: Another new worm??? Bennett Todd (Jun 24)
- Re: Another new worm??? Crispin Cowan (Jun 25)
- Re: Another new worm??? Elias Levy (Jun 26)
- Re: Another new worm??? Crispin Cowan (Jun 27)