Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Another new worm???
From: sigipp () WELLA COM BR (sigipp () WELLA COM BR)
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:51:50 -0300
Hi there
I would recommend that readers unsubscribe from the list if they or their systems are not prepared to view and analyze information disseminated here.
Shure. Or, for i´m not prepared for _everything_ i simply delete messages i eventually can´t handle. My father used to say "The most important button on TV is the OFF button". He is right. There is no law enforcing anyone to read _every_ mail in here, there is always an OFF (aka DELETE) button. I only expect having no mails here which could already do some harm without even opening it. This would make me really angry. But luckily we have a moderator here. Greetings Siegfried Gipp
Current thread:
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault, (continued)
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault Osvaldo J. Filho (Jun 23)
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault Michal Zalewski (Jun 23)
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault Jeff Bachtel (Jun 23)
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault Philip Rowlands (Jun 23)
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault Bluefish (Jun 24)
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault Jim Kinney (Jun 24)
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault Blue Boar (Jun 24)
- Different attack vector - PXE-2.0 protocol Ollie Whitehouse (Jun 25)
- Spoofed FTP connections John Scimone (Jun 25)
- Re: Red Hat 6.2's ftp segmentation fault Jason Storm (Jun 24)
- Keyboard recording Martin M Samson (Jun 21)
- Re: Another new worm??? Blue Boar (Jun 21)
- Re: Another new worm??? Steve Mosher (Jun 22)
- disclosure and risk to list subscribers (Re: Another new worm???) Mark Rafn (Jun 22)
- Re: Another new worm??? Bennett Todd (Jun 24)
- Re: Another new worm??? Crispin Cowan (Jun 25)