Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: R: R: New DoS attack
From: 11a () GMX NET (Bluefish)
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 17:16:45 +0200
Yeah, right, but introducing an "handshake" before sending game data would slow up the process so much? I do not believe so.
Probably not, especially if it is only used in the initial handshake.
but what drives some small, pathetic, human into bring down *games*??It seems that you miss the point that using games as flooders is not a DOS directed against game servers, but against other net users. Games server are DOSsed as a side-effect, in fact.
Yes, I missed it. Lazy reading, sorry ;) ..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.. http://www.11a.nu || http://bluefish.11a.nu eleventh alliance development & security team
Current thread:
- R: New DoS attack Raistlin (Jun 15)
- Re: R: New DoS attack Bluefish (Jun 17)
- Re: New DoS attack Mikael Olsson (Jun 18)
- R: R: New DoS attack Raistlin (Jun 20)
- Re: R: R: New DoS attack Bluefish (Jun 21)
- Re: R: New DoS attack Bluefish (Jun 17)