Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

[Hank Nussbacher <hank () interall co il>]

On 20/03/2021 21:34, Stan Barber wrote:

+1

-Hank

> +1 from the peanut gallery
>
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:30 PM Allen Kitchen 
> <allenmckinleykitchen () gmail com <mailto:allenmckinleykitchen () gmail com>> 
> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:07 PM Randy Bush <randy () psg com
>     <mailto:randy () psg com>> wrote:
>
>         i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic.
>         in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in
>         it being the de facto global anything-ops list.  perhaps we do not
>         need to fix that.
>
>         randy
>
>
>     +1 (or as much more as I can be credited for)
>
>     ..Allen