nanog mailing list archives

Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?


From: Stan Barber <sob () academ com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 14:34:20 -0500

+1 from the peanut gallery

On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:30 PM Allen Kitchen <
allenmckinleykitchen () gmail com> wrote:



On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:07 PM Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:

i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic.
in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in
it being the de facto global anything-ops list.  perhaps we do not
need to fix that.

randy


+1 (or as much more as I can be credited for)

..Allen


Current thread: