nanog mailing list archives
Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?
From: bzs () theworld com
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 02:48:39 -0400
And some of the lessons of group creation on USENET was: 1. You don't create a sub-topic to try to generate discussion. So for example you don't create talk.baseball.redsox because no one ever posts about the redsox in talk.baseball. It doesn't work. Not really relevant here tho it might become relevant. 2. You create a sub-topic to split large amounts of traffic like when there's just too much talk about the redsox and yankees in talk.baseball so you create talk.baseball.redsox and talk.redsox.yankees so those discussions can find each other. It's generally best when you're trying to split an overflow of traffic rather than enumerate or classify it or enforce some policy. 3. You don't create a sub-topic because some people don't want to see certain posts like talk.baseball.fights hoping to draw talk of on-field fights off talk.baseball. I think what's going on here is #3 mostly trying to pose as #2 and probably is unwise because it probably won't work plus or minus how much one can try to force the occasional off-topic poster off the list or to shame them. That is, people will seek their audience. P.S. Getto was a (mostly involuntary) Jewish neighborhood in Venice, Italy which is where the term Ghetto derives. I've been there (voluntarily.) "Getto" means "foundry" in Italian, it was a less desirable area because of the foundry there. On March 20, 2021 at 22:04 jim () reptiles org (Jim Mercer) wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 10:54:57AM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:That seems like a reasonable proposal. NANOG-OffTopic, NANOG-Discuss, NANOG-BizDev, NANOG-xyz, something (more more than one something).there used to be a thing called USENET. it facilitated a forum-like interface to mailing-lists, with the ability for anyone to create their own sub-forums. it was quite popular for a while. --jim -- Jim Mercer Reptilian Research jim () reptiles org +1 416 410-5633 Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!" -- Hunter S. Thompson
-- -Barry Shein Software Tool & Die | bzs () TheWorld com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
Current thread:
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?, (continued)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Alfie Pates (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? David Siegel (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Jim Mercer (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Karl Auer (Mar 22)
- Re: [External] Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Hunter Fuller via NANOG (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's not time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? John Levine (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's not time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Michael Hallgren (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Joe Provo (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Jim Mercer (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? bzs (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? William Herrin (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Tom Beecher (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? David Siegel (Mar 19)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Rich Kulawiec (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Niels Bakker (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Valdis Klētnieks (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Grant Taylor via NANOG (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? John Sage (Mar 20)