nanog mailing list archives

Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?


From: Allen Kitchen <allenmckinleykitchen () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 15:30:01 -0400

On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:07 PM Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:

i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic.
in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in
it being the de facto global anything-ops list.  perhaps we do not
need to fix that.

randy


+1 (or as much more as I can be credited for)

..Allen

Current thread: