Re: Ipv6 help

[Brian Johnson <brian.johnson () netgeek us>]

I do not work at either NANOG or Sony. How would my response imply that? Again, what is your point?

I have attended a lot of NANOG meetings and CGM/IPv6 transition was a point of discussion many times, but as usual it 
was always in the ether. Few actually deployed examples and always worried about breaking the Internet. We broke it 
decades ago and now we are reaping the rewards.

> On Aug 26, 2020, at 4:22 PM, surfer <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote:
>
> On 8/26/20 9:28 AM, Tony Wicks wrote:
> > > > They're the worst service company I have ever had the displeasure of dealing with, the arrogance and attitude of 
> > > > we are big, you are small we don't care about your customers was infuriating. Never have I seen a single call 
> > > > related to their opposition where as PSN accounted for about 10-20% of helpdesk calls. I don't understand why its 
> > > > seemingly impossible for them to implement ipv6 as almost everything I have deployed with CGN is dual stack V6.
> > > On 8/26/20 9:30 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> > > > We'll have to be creative with how we pressure them into getting serious
> > > > about IPv6.
> > > On Aug 26, 2020, at 3:06 PM, surfer <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Do those guys attend NANOG meetings?   >;-)   (evil smile)
>
> On 8/26/20 10:09 AM, Brian Johnson wrote:
> > I have/do. Do you have a point?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> I guess you're implying you work there.  Maybe someone will bake a cake for your company.
>
> scott