nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ipv6 help
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:08:35 +0200
On 27/Aug/20 07:58, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Because NAT64 implies DNS64, which avoids NATing any dual stack service. This makes a major difference today.
NAT64/DNS64 was the original solution. 464XLAT is the improved approach. See: https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-04.html Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Ipv6 help, (continued)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Bjørn Mork (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Andrews (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Andrews (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Ca By (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 27)