nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ipv6 help
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:00:13 +0200
On 27/Aug/20 08:57, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
This one is the published version: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8683/
Good man. NAT64/DNS64 is broken. I found this out myself in 2011 when I deployed it at $old_job in Malaysia. Skype broke, as did IPv4 literals. At the time, it was better than nothing. Then again, the world wasn't scrounging for IPv4 as much as it is today. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Ipv6 help, (continued)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Bjørn Mork (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Andrews (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Andrews (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Ca By (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 27)