Re: Ipv6 help

[Brian Johnson <brian.johnson () netgeek us>]

I must have been tired. I read it as do I go to NANOG meetings. Sorry for the confusion.

> On Aug 27, 2020, at 12:59 PM, surfer <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2020, at 4:22 PM, surfer <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote:
> On 8/26/20 9:28 AM, Tony Wicks wrote:
> > > > > > They're the worst service company I have ever had the displeasure of dealing with, the arrogance and attitude of 
> > > > > > we are big, you are small we don't care about your customers was infuriating. Never have I seen a single call 
> > > > > > related to their opposition where as PSN accounted for about 10-20% of helpdesk calls. I don't understand why 
> > > > > > its seemingly impossible for them to implement ipv6 as almost everything I have deployed with CGN is dual stack 
> > > > > > V6.
> > > > > On 8/26/20 9:30 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> > > > > > We'll have to be creative with how we pressure them into getting serious
> > > > > > about IPv6.
> > > > > On Aug 26, 2020, at 3:06 PM, surfer <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Do those guys attend NANOG meetings?   >;-)   (evil smile)
> > > On 8/26/20 10:09 AM, Brian Johnson wrote:
> > > > I have/do. Do you have a point?
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I guess you're implying you work there.  Maybe someone will bake a cake for your company.
> On 8/26/20 6:59 PM, Brian Johnson wrote:
> > I do not work at either NANOG or Sony. How would my response imply that? Again, what is your point?
> >
> > I have attended a lot of NANOG meetings and CGM/IPv6 transition was a point of discussion many times, but as usual 
> > it was always in the ether. Few actually deployed examples and always worried about breaking the Internet. We broke 
> > it decades ago and now we are reaping the rewards.
> > -----------------------------------------------------
>
> :: I do not work at either NANOG or Sony. How would my response imply that? Again, what is your point?
>
> Because I said "Do those guys attend NANOG meetings?" and you said "I have/do."  Seems pretty clear to me.
>
> My point is other NANOG folks could speak to the Sony network engineers directly and find out what Sony's plan is.
>
> scott