nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ipv6 help
From: Brian Johnson <brian.johnson () netgeek us>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 13:38:44 -0500
I‘m going further... They shouldn’t have to care. Sony should understand what they are delivering and the circumstance of that. That they refuse to serve some customers due to the technology they use is either a business decision or a faulty design. The end-customer (gamer) doesn’t care. They just want to play.
On Aug 26, 2020, at 1:31 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com> wrote: On 26/Aug/20 20:20, Brian Johnson wrote:Either way. Nothing you can do in the network will help Sony enable IPv6 capability, Or to serve their users even if using a technology that they do not like.Agreed. The problem is gaming customers that neither care for nor know about how NAT444 and/or IPv6 play (no pun intended) here. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Ipv6 help, (continued)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Andrews (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- RE: Ipv6 help Tony Wicks (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 26)
- Re: Ipv6 help surfer (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brian Johnson (Aug 27)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 26)