Re: Production-scale NAT64

[Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>]

On 27/Aug/15 17:57, Brandon Ross wrote:

>  
>
> I strongly advise you to not assume that just because an IPv4 address
> is "public" (which I'm reading as RFC1918) means that it's not NATed.
>
> I learned the hard way that Tmobile, for one, squats on other
> organization's public IP space on their mobile network and NATs it to
> address space they are actually assigned.  What you really mean is if
> your IPv4 is not NATed, then it should not "feel slow", the type of
> address isn't necessarily an indicator.

If we're being pedantic, yes.

Mark.