nanog mailing list archives
Re: Production-scale NAT64
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:45:10 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 26/Aug/15 18:42, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
Actually, the point is that if you're a content provider, there's a good chance that turning up IPv6 will result in happier eyeballs, which can probably be leveraged into a competitive advantage. And the more content providers do that, the smaller your transition problem becomes.
I can't argue with you there. But the problem has to be attacked from all sides. We can't just sit back and hope for the best; that's already nearly 2x decades in the making... Mark. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJV3e0WAAoJEGcZuYTeKm+G6DQP/iXbz6v6xWqAOyLU4TyVWJLa xcf0GBajZ7GR2iHNIqJ/usYAZg1nVvApoaBPd1tCegp8QWM2nzrAz1hRYFZnTZVY LTm40+6UD37/tMML9WgXyXw3qk/23LR0bY2IQZcwBtzscpStAEWCB304GPmyRS1X JFtunFTxE8zP1iD1ErE8CgHvJMN5vRGyJpASxWyk7ZS3UFWDfH1TVur+U9PsqiuZ av0tobjp+/tLgkMYTU2jRhnVbgnhXrkawS0uvT8uyt8ivn8Igf/f15SkM+X4DIJs Ck1Bu2cTtNW8QLuLbu/ue8M9S1JU/jHKS18LN0medoByqPJ1fLL1Ur3Xl2SzBDkm Fr9IZftTvLnpNvyP/FXLF6XH/CyzU1+lChOvhZ8Bmy305ETZFNz177fsjpcdVogg NiZ6GzHhA7wZ1NWrkqSVwdvCcg9kd413MKbhnWPi7cKB1Yi6Tewcam8+xCWH56T7 j2+2qhT3FPQHO5viVgfFEAhCB7PW2p9HRzf7mlpq7ykFIZG4t0oYpXqlBNuVd07o 7qKRIDFM8Ym8Po4edKxQLoW3w0yk8HDfcb8ByiDuoyDHX/ZcrKZY2ME6WTyUBgKf 58w/0IbSJaeTHTjyAaZu/MwgP/WFBzul6sKnXh3aQrdrVOo6xrcW0EvvN+wZGD5D AjhpcWdteKjf/Smv/HlG =igCd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: Production-scale NAT64, (continued)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Randy Bush (Aug 29)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Ca By (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Bjoern A. Zeeb (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Ca By (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)