nanog mailing list archives
Re: Production-scale NAT64
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:35:57 +0200
On 26/Aug/15 16:28, Ca By wrote:
From largish deployment ... Another relevant metric, less than 25% of my mobile subscribers traffic require NAT64 translating. 75+% of bits flows through end-to-end IPv6 (thanks Google/Youtube, Facebook, Netflix, Yahoo, Linkedin and so on ...).
And trust me, Cameron knows what's on about... And just in case it's not obvious, fewer and fewer bits will need to hit the NAT64 gateways as more and more of the Internet turns up IPv6. And the beauty of it all, NAT64-based service providers don't have to decommission anything in the future; this is one of the key points around using NAT64 as transition tech. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Production-scale NAT64, (continued)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Tore Anderson (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Andrews (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Tore Anderson (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Brandon Ross (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Randy Bush (Aug 29)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Ca By (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Bjoern A. Zeeb (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Ca By (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)