Re: Production-scale NAT64

[Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>]

On 27/Aug/15 07:16, Mark Andrews wrote:

> Or why you are looking at NAT64 instead of DS-Lite, MAP-E, or MAP-T
> all of which are better solutions than NAT64.  NAT64 + DNS64 which
> breaks DNSSEC.

Because with NAT64/DNS64/464XLAT, there isn't any "undo work" after the
dust settles.

There is value in that.

Mark.