nanog mailing list archives
Re: Production-scale NAT64
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:16:11 -0400
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:28:08 -0700, Ca By said:
Another relevant metric, less than 25% of my mobile subscribers traffic require NAT64 translating. 75+% of bits flows through end-to-end IPv6 (thanks Google/Youtube, Facebook, Netflix, Yahoo, Linkedin and so on ...).
So I'm guessing that 75% of the traffic flows with better latency than the 25% IPvhorse-n-buggy traffic? ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Production-scale NAT64, (continued)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Tore Anderson (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Andrews (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Tore Anderson (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Brandon Ross (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Randy Bush (Aug 29)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Ca By (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Bjoern A. Zeeb (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Ca By (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)