nanog mailing list archives
Re: Production-scale NAT64
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:39:11 +0200
On 26/Aug/15 16:32, Jared Mauch wrote:
This for me is an important note, because if your site only gives out an A address, it’s going to be slowed by the NAT process. I have noticed the IPv4 penalty getting worse with many locations.
But you only need to hit the NAT64 gateway "if" you are IPv6-only. If you're dual-stacked, your route to an A record will not hit the NAT64 gateway. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Production-scale NAT64, (continued)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 William Herrin (Aug 20)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Ca By (Aug 20)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 William Herrin (Aug 20)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Tore Anderson (Aug 25)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Ca By (Aug 20)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 William Herrin (Aug 20)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Tom Lanyon (Aug 25)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Izaac (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Ca By (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Jared Mauch (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Jared Mauch (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Tore Anderson (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Andrews (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Tore Anderson (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Brandon Ross (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)