nanog mailing list archives

Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police

From: Joe Abley <jabley () automagic org>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 08:15:57 -0500


On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 11:50:42PM -0600, JIM FLEMING wrote:


----- Original Message -----
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () att net il>


Your definition of content filtering is just one of many.  Any blocking of
*any* bit of IP data flow is some form of content filtering.


What about "changing" any bit of the IPv4 data flow ?


Like the TTL?

Current thread:

Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police, (continued)
- - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Shawn McMahon (Nov 20)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 20)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 20)
  - "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." JIM FLEMING (Nov 20)
    - Re: "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." Bora Akyol (Nov 20)
    - Re: "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." Joe Abley (Nov 21)
  - RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Jason Slagle (Nov 21)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Stephen Sprunk (Nov 21)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Hank Nussbacher (Nov 20)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police JIM FLEMING (Nov 20)
    - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Joe Abley (Nov 21)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 21)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Mike Johnson (Nov 21)
  - RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Jason Slagle (Nov 21)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 21)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Shawn McMahon (Nov 22)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 22)
  - RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Dan Hollis (Nov 22)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Shawn McMahon (Nov 22)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Mathew Butler (Nov 22)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Steve Sobol (Nov 22)

(Thread continues...)