nanog mailing list archives

Re: Fw: "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...."

From: Steve Rubin <ser () tch org>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 01:31:12 -0800


On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 01:58:20AM -0600, JIM FLEMING wrote:

If Karl[1] were here, he would probably refer to that as a
NotWork, as opposed to
a NetWork.
[1] - http://www.denninger.net/


Ok, who let this nutcase back in?

-- 
Steve Rubin          / KG6DFV  /  Phone: (408)270-3258 Fax: (408)270-3273
Email: ser () tch org  /  N57DL  /   http://www.tch.org/~ser/

Current thread:

Fw: "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." JIM FLEMING (Nov 20)
- Message not available
  - Re: Fw: "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." JIM FLEMING (Nov 21)
    - Re: Fw: "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." Steve Rubin (Nov 21)
    - Re: Fw: "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." Edward S. Marshall (Nov 21)