nanog mailing list archives
RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 07:37:16 -0800
From: Jason Slagle [mailto:raistlin () tacorp net] Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 5:53 AM You basically have 3 choices here. 1) Filter known trojan ports to your customers (Which argueably may or may not include port 139) 2) Routinely scan your customer blocks and inform them of trojans they could be infected with, and any open shares. 3) Do nothing and deal with the possible fallout which may include turning down the customers port, if they get compromised. Which do YOU view as the lesser of the evils here. Your arguing 1 isn't doable. 2 is possibly a no go, depending on the contract and customer also, and 3 isn't very good either.
There is a fourth that I'm surprised that only one or two of you picked up on (private mail). 4) Offer port filtering as an added premium service that adds to your revenue stream. That way it is customer choice. However, this only applies to access providers. Backbone providers don't have this option.
Current thread:
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police, (continued)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 20)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 20)
- "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." JIM FLEMING (Nov 20)
- Re: "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." Bora Akyol (Nov 20)
- Re: "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." Joe Abley (Nov 21)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Jason Slagle (Nov 21)
- Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Stephen Sprunk (Nov 21)
- "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." JIM FLEMING (Nov 20)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Hank Nussbacher (Nov 20)
- Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police JIM FLEMING (Nov 20)
- Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Joe Abley (Nov 21)
- Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police JIM FLEMING (Nov 20)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 21)
- Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Mike Johnson (Nov 21)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Jason Slagle (Nov 21)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 21)
- Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Shawn McMahon (Nov 22)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 22)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Dan Hollis (Nov 22)
- Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Shawn McMahon (Nov 22)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Mathew Butler (Nov 22)
- Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Steve Sobol (Nov 22)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Mathew Butler (Nov 27)