nanog mailing list archives

RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police

From: Jason Slagle <raistlin () tacorp net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:33:57 -0500 (EST)

4) Offer port filtering as an added premium service that adds to your
revenue stream. That way it is customer choice. However, this only applies
to access providers. Backbone providers don't have this option.


And if they don't take it and are being used as a DDOS amp?

You are they back to option 3, which is if they are being used to attack
others you turn them off till they fix it...

Jason

Current thread:

"...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end....", (continued)
- - "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." JIM FLEMING (Nov 20)
    - Re: "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." Bora Akyol (Nov 20)
    - Re: "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." Joe Abley (Nov 21)
  - RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Jason Slagle (Nov 21)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Stephen Sprunk (Nov 21)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Hank Nussbacher (Nov 20)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police JIM FLEMING (Nov 20)
    - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Joe Abley (Nov 21)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 21)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Mike Johnson (Nov 21)
  - RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Jason Slagle (Nov 21)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 21)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Shawn McMahon (Nov 22)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 22)
  - RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Dan Hollis (Nov 22)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Shawn McMahon (Nov 22)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Mathew Butler (Nov 22)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Steve Sobol (Nov 22)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Mathew Butler (Nov 27)