nanog mailing list archives

RE: Packet Loss

From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:21:42 -0800

From: Scott Bradner [mailto:sob () harvard edu]
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 10:52 AM

Can we call on the Avian Carrier RFC here?  Packet Loss may

take on a whole

new meaning here...


especially for the bulk transfer mode


Never under-estimate the bandwidth of a mini-van filled with DLT tapes, on
the freeway at 65 mph.
        - updated to current - rmeyer - original author unknown

Current thread:

Re: Packet Loss, (continued)
- - Re: Packet Loss Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Brian W. (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
  - RE: Packet Loss Patrick Greenwell (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Tony Rall (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Alex Bligh (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Karyn Ulriksen (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Karyn Ulriksen (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Scott Bradner (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 14)
    - Re: Packet Loss scott w (Dec 14)
    - Re: Packet Loss David Lesher (Dec 14)
    - Re: Packet Loss Andrew Partan (Dec 14)
  - RE: Packet Loss Joel Jaeggli (Dec 14)
    - Re: Packet Loss Bennett Todd (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Larry Sheldon (Dec 14)
    - monitoring Michael Long (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)

(Thread continues...)