RE: Packet Loss

[Karyn Ulriksen <kulriksen () publichost com>]

Can we call on the Avian Carrier RFC here?  Packet Loss may take on a whole
new meaning here...

K  (sorry, couldn't resist)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark E. Perkins [mailto:meperkins () att com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 9:42 AM
> To: Randy Bush; Charles Smith
> Cc: nanog () merit edu
> Subject: Re: Packet Loss
>
>
>
> Perhaps you mean 2680? (As in RFC)
>
> --On Thursday, December 14, 2000 5:20 PM +0000 Randy Bush 
> <randy () psg com> 
> wrote:
>
> > > Does anyone have a good definition of packet loss? If so, 
> please send me
> > > the appropriate verbiage. I cannot seem to articulate a strict
> > > definition.
> >
> > 2628