nanog mailing list archives
RE: Packet Loss
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:01:53 -0800
From: Patrick Greenwell [mailto:patrick () cybernothing org] Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 10:01 AM
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Roeland Meyer wrote:strict definition.2628^7 <blush>i can't seem to find the proper decoder-ring so i can'tdecode your comment.this one's a bit too terse even for you. a few more hints ... pls?RFC 2678
thx, got it!
Current thread:
- Re: Packet Loss, (continued)
- Re: Packet Loss Mark E. Perkins (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Randy Bush (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Mark E. Perkins (Dec 14)
- Packet Loss Charles Smith (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Brian W. (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Patrick Greenwell (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Tony Rall (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Alex Bligh (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Karyn Ulriksen (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Karyn Ulriksen (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Scott Bradner (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss scott w (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss David Lesher (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Andrew Partan (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Joel Jaeggli (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Bennett Todd (Dec 15)