nanog mailing list archives
RE: Packet Loss
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:30:21 -0800
From: Steven M. Bellovin [mailto:smb () research att com] Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 1:14 PM
Never under-estimate the bandwidth of a mini-van filledwith DLT tapes, onthe freeway at 65 mph. - updated to current - rmeyer - original author unknownAndy Tanenbaum, "Computer Networks", if I remember correctly.*Much* older -- I first heard it in 1969, and I don't think it was orginal then...
I know for certain that it dates back to the pain-frame daze and originally refered to 9600 baud open-reel tape. It was a true anacdote involving a chevy impala stationwagon and they needed to get a massive amount of IBM 360 data, from somewhere in Los Angeles to Sacramento. One of the alternatives was unreliable 300 baud links (1200 baud wouldn't work for some reason). They chose to use the chevy, they beat the time by days. I was an MTS-III, at /HAC/C&DP/LB (pre-GM), when I heard it the first time. I am amazed that, that far back (20 years), I remember that much detail. The context I heard it in was that we had a similar problem getting some data from behind the "cactus curtain", in Tuscon, AZ. If you want to transfer a multi-TB database, a short distance, it still holds true.
Current thread:
- RE: Packet Loss, (continued)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss scott w (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss David Lesher (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Andrew Partan (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Joel Jaeggli (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Bennett Todd (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Larry Sheldon (Dec 14)
- monitoring Michael Long (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss John Fraizer (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Marshall Eubanks (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Hugh Irvine (Dec 15)
- Re: Packet Loss Paul Timmins (Dec 16)
- Re: Packet Loss doug (Dec 16)