nanog mailing list archives

Re: Packet Loss

From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () opaltelecom co uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 17:18:40 +0000 (GMT)



You send a packet, if it doesnt get to its destination then its lost.

On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Charles Smith wrote:


Does anyone have a good definition of packet loss? If so, please send me the 
appropriate verbiage. I cannot seem to articulate a strict definition.

Chas
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

Current thread:

Packet Loss Charles Smith (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Randy Bush (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Randy Bush (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Mark E. Perkins (Dec 14)
    - Re: Packet Loss Randy Bush (Dec 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Packet Loss Charles Smith (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Brian W. (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
  - RE: Packet Loss Patrick Greenwell (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Tony Rall (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Alex Bligh (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Karyn Ulriksen (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Karyn Ulriksen (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Scott Bradner (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)

(Thread continues...)