nanog mailing list archives

RE: Packet Loss

From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:43:16 -0800

From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy () psg com]
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 9:30 AM

Does anyone have a good definition of packet loss? If so,

please send me

the appropriate verbiage. I cannot seem to articulate a

strict definition.

    ^7

<blush>


i can't seem to find the proper decoder-ring so i can't decode your comment.
this one's a bit too terse even for you. a few more hints ... pls?

Current thread:

Packet Loss Charles Smith (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Randy Bush (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Randy Bush (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Mark E. Perkins (Dec 14)
    - Re: Packet Loss Randy Bush (Dec 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Packet Loss Charles Smith (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Brian W. (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
  - RE: Packet Loss Patrick Greenwell (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Tony Rall (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Alex Bligh (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Karyn Ulriksen (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Karyn Ulriksen (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Scott Bradner (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 14)
    - Re: Packet Loss scott w (Dec 14)

(Thread continues...)