Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Access to Porn sites?
From: David Eilken <david.eilken () DOMAIL MARICOPA EDU>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:35:53 -0700
Thanks all for responses on this. Regarding the larger topic of Academic Freedom, which doesn't make the Internet open and fully accessible. We all (users of technology) have to block things - lots of things. As technology professionals, we all know this. It is simply not practical or ethical to have a fully open computing environment. Boundaries are a necessity; besides your ISP would shut you down at some point. I like Randy at VA Tech's thoughts that were focused on the technical controls. Regardless of the content, there are things that are known bad. We all should be blocking bad things. However we determine what is bad (different vendors have different kinds/ quality of intelligence), there will always be false-positives. We still have to draw lines in the sand and those lines will never be perfect. Sometimes faculty and other non-technical people may get this confused. We all already block/ filter bad things, some porn/gambling sites will cross that line and should be filtered. If you can't draw your lines as clear as some, with the intelligence sources as Randy noted, it comes down to your level of risk tolerance. The risks with porn surfing specifically change daily but generally, we know it to be bad. I personally believe you should block it and provide exceptions where needed. That is a prudent and practical approach, as the risks are real and significant, and the actual permitted use cases for access to it are few. Dave E On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:57 AM Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:13:39 -0700, Babak Oskouian said:Another concern is 18 U.S. Code 2258A. As you know 18 U.S. Code 2258A explicitly requires all Internet providers to report any and all digital viewing, downloading and possession of child pornography to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Very stiff penalties ($150,000 first incidence, and $300,000 second incidence) are imposed on anyproviderfor failure to report. Do you think (or has your legal counselexplicitlyassured you) that your institute is exempt form this law?This is well into very tricky legal territory indeed, because it's a field where writing the laws to avoid unintended consequences is very difficult. 18 USC 2258A only requires reporting child pornography that you're aware of. If you don't know about it, you don't have to report it. This means that the ISP is better off not searching user datastreams for it, especially in combination with... Meanwhile, at the state level, possession of child pornography is usually a 'strict liability' offense, meaning there's no mens rea (state of mind) component to it. This means that if a user accidentally downloads some CP because it was labeled "Pirated Copy Of This Year's Top Movie.mp4", they have an *extremely high* DIS-incentive to report it, because they now have child pornography on their computer. And since consideration of intent is prohibited, that means that the fact you had no intent doesn't matter - you downloaded it, you have it (or had it) on your computer and that alone is sufficient to make you guilty of possession yourself. Who is going to report accidentally discovered child pornography when you have to take it on faith that the police and district attorney are going to believe that it's accidental? (See other post regarding porn sites that don't do their due diligence regarding 18 USC 2257 record keeping....) ********** Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community
-- [image: Maricopa Community College District Office logo] DAVID EILKEN MA MBA CISSP-ISSMP CISM CRISC C|CISO MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGES Information Security Officer | ITS 2411 West 14th Street, Tempe, AZ 85281 david.eilken () domail maricopa edu https://www.maricopa.edu/ O: 480-784-0637 LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/school/maricopa-community-colleges>| Twitter <https://twitter.com/mcccd>| Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/maricopa.edu> ********** Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community
Current thread:
- Re: [EXT] Re: [SECURITY] Access to Porn sites?, (continued)
- Re: [EXT] Re: [SECURITY] Access to Porn sites? Gary McCullors (Aug 15)
- Re: [EXT] Re: [SECURITY] Access to Porn sites? randy (Aug 15)
- Re: [EXT] Re: [SECURITY] Access to Porn sites? Gary McCullors (Aug 15)
- Re: Access to Porn sites? Boyd, Daniel (Aug 15)
- Re: Access to Porn sites? Scott Gennari (Aug 15)
- Re: Access to Porn sites? Boyd, Daniel (Aug 15)
- Re: Access to Porn sites? King, Ronald A. (Aug 15)
- Re: Access to Porn sites? Pete, Andrew (Aug 15)
- Re: Access to Porn sites? Scott Gennari (Aug 15)
- Re: Access to Porn sites? Babak Oskouian (Aug 15)
- Re: Access to Porn sites? John McCabe (Aug 15)
- Re: Access to Porn sites? Valdis Klētnieks (Aug 15)
- Re: Access to Porn sites? David Eilken (Aug 15)
- Re: [External] Re: [SECURITY] Access to Porn sites? Thomas Dugas (Aug 15)
- Re: Access to Porn sites? David Opitz (Aug 15)
- Re: Access to Porn sites? David Eilken (Aug 15)
- Re: Access to Porn sites? Pardonek, Jim (Aug 15)
- Re: Access to Porn sites? Barton, Robert W. (Aug 14)
- Re: [Ext] Re: [SECURITY] Access to Porn sites? Cooper, Micah J (Aug 15)