Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
sdmi info
From: Phosgene <phosgene () SETEC ORG>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 03:17:01 -0400
let me give you some quotes from an article which have more info about the SDMI protocol... "To better understand this concept, consider the SDMI scheme (Figure 2). SDMI requires that any device storing digital audio contain a 32-bit predefined manufacturer ID or 128-bit random number to generate security keys. Where does this identifier come from? One possible source is a data pattern embedded within a smart card, parallel-port "dongle," or flash-memory card.... However, DMI's Version 1.0 specification defines a specific watermark technique that Verance developed and DVD Audio also plans to incorporate. It lets you make, by default, four copiesadjustable from zero to an infinite number of copiesof the downloaded media for distribution to and movement among devices such as other PCs or portable audio players. You must check a copy back in before you can make another. SDMI also specifies multiple access levels. SDMI 1.0-compliant devices must search for the Verance watermark at least every 15 seconds. SDMI-compliant hardware will carry the DMAT (Digital Music Access Technology) stamp of approval The not-yet-finalized SDMI 2.0 specification defines another set of watermarks. They include a "do-not-import-if-previously-compressed" flag that would prevent playback of, for example, MP3 files that users obtained by some means other than from their private audio-CD collections using an SDMI-compliant "ripping" (extracting-to-hard-drive) program (Reference 3). SDMI 1.0-compliant players must search for the 2.0-indicating "trigger" and then cannot play SDMI-compliant media until the user upgrades the player firmware. These additional proposed watermarks may inhibit users' abilities to play their MP3 libraries. If implemented in the final specification, these additional security measures will likely trigger a consumer uproar like the one that the "millennium trigger" caused during the early drafts of the SDMI 1.0 specification." you might as well check the article http://www.ednmag.com/ednmag/reg/2000/06222000/13tt.htm phosgene
Current thread:
- Re: hacksdmi?, (continued)
- Re: hacksdmi? Granquist, Lamont (Oct 14)
- Re: hacksdmi? Ben Galehouse (Oct 15)
- Re: hacksdmi? David Knaack (Oct 16)
- Re: hacksdmi? Granquist, Lamont (Oct 14)
- Re: hacksdmi? Jord Sonneveld (Oct 11)
- Re: hacksdmi? aliver vilereal (Oct 12)
- Re: hacksdmi? Ralph Moonen (Oct 12)
- Re: hacksdmi? Steve Mosher (Oct 12)
- Re: hacksdmi? Everhart, Glenn (FUSA) (Oct 12)
- Re: hacksdmi? Brooke, O'neil (EXP) (Oct 16)
- Re: hacksdmi? Bluefish (P.Magnusson) (Oct 19)
- sdmi info Phosgene (Oct 20)
- Re: hacksdmi? Steve Mosher (Oct 20)
- Re: hacksdmi? Joseph Pingenot (Oct 20)
- Re: hacksdmi? Richard Rager (Oct 24)
- Re: hacksdmi? Erhard Schwenk (Oct 24)
- Re: hacksdmi? Ian Stoba (Oct 20)
- Re: hacksdmi? Christian (Oct 24)
- Re: hacksdmi? Bluefish (P.Magnusson) (Oct 24)
- Re: hacksdmi? Damian Menscher (Oct 24)
- Re: hacksdmi? Vitaly Osipov (Oct 27)
- Re: hacksdmi? Knud Erik Hojgaard - CyberCity Support (Oct 27)
(Thread continues...)