Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Information on Raptor
From: Mark-Crother () SONOMA-SYSTEMS COM (Crother, Mark)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:07:59 -0800
From: Malikai [mailto:malikai () INTERACTIVEALIEN COM] Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 10:27 AM On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, James Crooks wrote:
[stuff nuked]
I agree 100% with all of these statements. I do however, belive that people (including myself) should understand the issues involved with proxy servers and the proxy vs. filter battles. I'm sure that people involved in both ends have verry important and useful points to make. Of course, this is assuming that people can communicate about the issues, and prevent valid argument from becoming flame wars. [=
I guess I don't understand why people would consider a proxy vs filter battle. A good firewall design would use both filters and application proxies. They both provide different types of protection. Plus, by using a network device made for filtering, that could free up the router from doing that CPU intensive task.
-Malikai
--Mark
Current thread:
- Re: Information on Raptor, (continued)
- Re: Information on Raptor James Crooks (Feb 21)
- Re: Information on Raptor David J Laumann (Feb 21)
- Re: Information on Raptor Marcelo Amaral - ALTAVISTA.NET (Feb 21)
- Re: Information on Raptor CL: Nelson, Jeff (Feb 24)
- Re: Information on Raptor IC&S - Eelco van Beek (Feb 25)
- Re: Information on Raptor Daniel Liebster (Feb 25)
- Re: Information on Raptor Ben Grubin (Feb 24)
- Dedicated vs "shared use" firewalls Forrest W. Christian (Feb 24)
- Buffer overflows on Netware 4x and 5x Roland Kool (Feb 28)
- Re: Dedicated vs "shared use" firewalls Anton J Aylward, CISSP (Feb 28)
- Dedicated vs "shared use" firewalls Forrest W. Christian (Feb 24)
- Re: Information on Raptor Crother, Mark (Feb 24)