Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow
From: buanzox () USA NET (Arturo Busleiman)
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 20:14:24 -0300
On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Mark L. Jackson wrote:
// How does one tell the diffrence in architechture remotely, when // the OS runs // on multiple architechtures? Well scanning is the first and I think easiest method. You decide what type of system you want to hit and then scan IPs for a specific response known to come from that system. Example Sun is known to have RPC problems.
[snip!] well, you are right... but the question was related to the architecture, (sparc, x86, etc) not the operating system. *> Get PGP KEY: use pgpk -a hkp://horowitz.surfnet.nl/buanzox () usa net *> Lista social de mail. Envia e-mail en blanco a lsb-subscribe () egroups com *> Panic? My kernel doesn't panic! We are doomed! DustDustDust!!!!
Current thread:
- Re: long file names in explorer.exe, (continued)
- Re: long file names in explorer.exe kj (Apr 28)
- Lotus notes + windows98 overflow Alistair Orchard (Apr 27)
- Blind Remote Buffer Overflow Granquist, Lamont (Apr 27)
- Eudora Pro Buffer Overflow testing in progress - help needed. Zoa_Chien (Apr 28)
- Re: Eudora Pro Buffer Overflow testing in progress - help needed. Blue Boar (Apr 28)
- Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow Marc (Apr 28)
- Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow Ralph The Wonder Llama (Apr 28)
- Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow Matthew R. Potter (Apr 28)
- Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow Sebastian (Apr 29)
- Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow Mark L. Jackson (Apr 29)
- Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow Arturo Busleiman (Apr 30)
- Re: Blind Remote Buffer Overflow Arturo Busleiman (Apr 30)
- Replacing Kernel Functions via a LKM Granquist, Lamont (Apr 27)
- Re: Replacing Kernel Functions via a LKM Dragos Ruiu (Apr 27)
- Re: Replacing Kernel Functions via a LKM Dragos Ruiu (Apr 28)
- Re: Replacing Kernel Functions via a LKM Prateek Jetly (Apr 27)
- Re: No-Exec Stack Smashing 101 Michael H. Warfield (Apr 26)
- Re: No-Exec Stack Smashing 101 Crispin Cowan (Apr 26)
- Re: No-Exec Stack Smashing 101 Taneli Huuskonen (Apr 26)
- Re: No-Exec Stack Smashing 101 Michael H. Warfield (Apr 20)