Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Socat
From: Andreas Ericsson <ae () op5 se>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 20:17:54 +0200
MadHat wrote:
On Jun 16, 2005, at 6:06 AM, Andreas Ericsson wrote:Max wrote:A Windows version of this sort of tool is *mandatory* since it is often used as a backdoor/tunnel on a vulnerable machine. And what OS is more vulnerable than any other ? Hence this mandatory requirement :-)Bah! The kids that needs a netcat-like program to backdoor a system aren't really worthy of owning it in the first place. Spending quality coding time so that juvenile idiots (the kind that have a hard time grasping the meaning of the switch() statement) have a means of quickly doing something non-constructive and possibly illegal is not my idea of fun.That is like saying I won't make a hammer because it might be used to bash someone's head in.
More like sitting in a wheelchair and building surfboards for no-one in particular.
It's just a tool. Also, note the smiley at the end of his statement, usually used to denote a bit of fun or sometimes sarcasm.
I saw that as belonging to the "What os is more vulnerable...." part of it.
Yes, there are other implementations os netcat out there. I think Fyodor's idea is to possibly expand nmap to be a set of tools, instead of just one tool. So instead of installed 3 or 4 packages to do all your scanning and testing, you install one. Maybe similar interfaces (CLI options) and all the same quality.
Oh, so it'd be like inventing the wheel when you've already started on rocket science then? I'd just love to see nping, ncat, nawk, ngrep (oh wait, that last one exists), nperl, nls (another acronym for that, I suppose), ncut, nvim, ndate, ndd, nsed and a dozen other tools. Never mind that it wouldn't be logical to use either one of them. Since it can be done, it should be done. Something worth while would be write a testing engine for vulnerabilities to serially try various exploits on a wide range of hosts. The exploits could be distributed in much the same way as the OS fingerprint file is today. That would be nmap'ish as well, since it would definitely be usefule for the whitehats while being close to invaluable for those nocturnal fellas out there as well.
Remember this is also for the Summer of Code. This may not bee added, may not be maintained after the end of the summer and may not even be finished. I think it sounds interesting none the less.
True. Student projects tend to lean somewhat toward intellectual masturbation. Let's just hope they don't get carried away with their own cleverness.
M@x Martin Maèok wrote:On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:36:32AM -0700, Fyodor wrote:Netcat has been totally unmaintained for about a decade, and I think Nmap users would benefit from a tool similar to hping2 that is more oriented toward their needs.I'm still happy with hping2 (ok, lets forget about the patches we had to apply to it ;-) *except* its poor ICMP support (sing is better here). Anyway, your proposal for Netcat enhancement almost exactly fits Socat. Have you heard of it? Wonderful tool (and GPL) ... http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/ Martin Maèok ICT Security Consultant_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev-- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson () op5 se OP5 AB www.op5.se Lead Developer _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
-- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson () op5 se OP5 AB www.op5.se Lead Developer _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping?, (continued)
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping? Simon Spencer (Jun 16)
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping? Andreia Gaita (Jun 16)
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping? Simon Spencer (Jun 16)
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping? Fyodor (Jun 15)
- Re: What would we want in a new Netcat/Hping? Chuck (Jun 15)