nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Experiment
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 08:15:03 -0800
i just want to make sure that folk are really in agreement with what i think i have been hearing from a lot of strident voices here. if you know of an out-of-spec vulnerability or bug in deployed router, switch, server, ... ops and researchers should exploit it as much as possible in order to encourage fixing of the hole. given the number of bugs/vulns, are you comfortable that this is going to scale well? and this is prudent when our primary responsibility is a running internet? just checkin' randy PS: if you think this, speak up so i can note to never hire or recommend you. PPS: Anant Shah, Romain Fontugne, Emile Aben, Cristel Pelsser, and Randy Bush; "Disco: Fast, Good, and Cheap Outage Detection"; TMA 2017 ^^^^^ :)
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Experiment, (continued)
- Re: BGP Experiment Paul S. (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- Global statistics during the experiment (was Re: BGP Experiment) Mike Tancsa (Jan 24)
- Re: Global statistics during the experiment (was Re: BGP Experiment) Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mike Hale (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment valdis . kletnieks (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Tom Beecher (Jan 25)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy via NANOG (Jan 25)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mark Tees (Jan 25)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mark Tees (Jan 25)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy Bush (Jan 26)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: BGP Experiment valdis . kletnieks (Jan 26)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy Bush (Jan 26)
- Re: BGP Experiment Eric Kuhnke (Jan 26)
- Re: BGP Experiment Nick Hilliard (Jan 26)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy Bush (Jan 26)
- Re: BGP Experiment William Allen Simpson (Jan 27)
- [2019/01/27] Re: BGP Experiment Hansen, Christoffer (Jan 27)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy Bush (Jan 27)