nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Experiment
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 04:27:36 +0300
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 3:23 AM Paul S. <contact () winterei se> wrote:
As others have noted, the right target to be angry at is your equipment vendor.
...whose name I'd personally be quite delighted to finally hear. Is it just the same FRR that got a patch someone failed to apply, or this time the issue is more serious?
Replying to throw in my support behind continuing the experiment as well.
+1. I've yet to see any disruptions caused by the experiment in my area. -- Töma
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Experiment, (continued)
- Re: BGP Experiment Brian Kantor (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Paul S. (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- Global statistics during the experiment (was Re: BGP Experiment) Mike Tancsa (Jan 24)
- Re: Global statistics during the experiment (was Re: BGP Experiment) Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mike Hale (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment valdis . kletnieks (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Tom Beecher (Jan 25)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy via NANOG (Jan 25)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mark Tees (Jan 25)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mark Tees (Jan 25)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy Bush (Jan 26)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 26)