Re: Free access to measurement network

[Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>]

It's a consumer thing. If consumers wanted more options, they would be supporting those options with their wallets. 
They don't. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Max Tulyev" <maxtul () netassist ua> 
To: nanog () nanog org 
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 4:43:54 AM 
Subject: Re: Free access to measurement network 

So for my point of view, better solution is to push some law that ease 
access to the buildings for ISPs. 

15.12.17 19:40, valdis.kletnieks () vt edu пише: 
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:47:42 -0500, Dovid Bender said: 
> > What kind of internet are these devices on? With Net Neutrality gone here 
> > in the US it would be a good way to measure certain services such as SIP to 
> > see which ISP's if any are tampering with packets. 
>
> Given previous history, the answer will probably be "most of them". 
>
> "The results are not inspiring. More than 129 million people are limited to a 
> single provider for broadband Internet access using the FCC definition of 25 
> Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload. Out of those 129 million Americans, about 52 
> million must obtain Internet access from a company that has violated network 
> neutrality protections in the past and continues to undermine the policy today. 
>
> In locations where subscribers have the benefit of limited competition, the 
> situation isn't much better. Among the 146 million Americans with the ability 
> to choose between two providers, 48 million Americans must choose between two 
> companies that have a record of violating network neutrality." 
>
> https://muninetworks.org/content/177-million-americans-harmed-net-neutrality