nanog mailing list archives

Re: de-peering for security sake


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 19:38:12 -0800

Yes… Isn’t it impressive just how persistent the bad idea fairy can be?

Owen

On Dec 24, 2015, at 19:25 , Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com> wrote:

Hmm, has anyone at all kept count of the number of times such a discussion has started up in just the last year, and 
how many more times in the past 16 or so years?

Mind you, back in say 2004, this discussion would have run to 50 or 60 emails at a bare minimum, in no time at all.

--srs

On 25-Dec-2015, at 6:55 AM, Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net> wrote:

On 12/24/2015 04:50 PM, Daniel Corbe wrote:
Let’s just cut off the entirety of the third world instead of having
a tangible mitigation plan in place.

While you thing you are making a snarky response, it would be handy for end users to be able to turn on and off 
access to other countries retail.


Current thread: