nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Daniel Corbe <dcorbe () hammerfiber com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 09:11:55 -0500
On Dec 25, 2015, at 7:14 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote: Daniel Corbe wrote:Let’s just cut off the entirety of the third world instead of having a tangible mitigation plan in place.You mean, cut off Sweden, Ireland, Finland, Switzerland and Israel?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_WorldWhat an enormously silly idea. Seasons greetings to all, Nick
It was a stupid idea even before you corrected me.
Current thread:
- Re: de-peering for security sake, (continued)
- Re: de-peering for security sake TR Shaw (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Andrew Kirch (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Jared Mauch (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Hugo Slabbert (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Nick Hilliard (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Daniel Corbe (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Stephen Satchell (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Daniel Corbe (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Daniel Corbe (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 25)
- Message not available
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Stephen Satchell (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Dec 26)