nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 16:17:30 -0500
On Dec 25, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Colin Johnston <colinj () gt86car org uk> wrote: why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse reports, normal slow speed network abuse is tolerated, but not high speed deliberate abuse albeit compromised machines
Biggest reason I’ve seen is the same reason I delete spam in Chinese/Japanese/charset that is foreign to me. When I know I’m supposed to be reading something I toss it into google translate, when I don’t expect it, it may not even reach my $inbox. I’d expect writing to people in their non-native language is more likely to result in things being ignored or misclassified[1]. I work for a part of a multinational that doesn’t use the roman alphabet and mails are sometimes missed for this reason between our groups. This is far more of a two way street than people realize. When you find that person who speaks both languages it can remove hurdles. - Jared 1 - Think of the setting ok_languages in spamassassin.
Current thread:
- Re: de-peering for security sake, (continued)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Clayton Zekelman (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Hugo Slabbert (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake TR Shaw (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Andrew Kirch (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Jared Mauch (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Hugo Slabbert (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Nick Hilliard (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Daniel Corbe (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Stephen Satchell (Dec 25)