nanog mailing list archives

Re: de-peering for security sake


From: Clayton Zekelman <clayton () mnsi net>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 17:12:04 -0500

Just an off the cuff thought but if the format of the abuse messages could be standardized so handling them would be 
semi-automated somewhat like ACNS notices, it might improve response.

Maybe such a format already exists and just isn't widely used.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 25, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se> wrote:

On Fri, 25 Dec 2015, Colin Johnston wrote:

why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse reports, normal slow speed network abuse is tolerated, 
but not high speed deliberate abuse albeit compromised machines

This is not a chinese problem, this is a general ISP problem. Most ISPs do not respond to abuse reports.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se


Current thread: