nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 21:29:05 +0100
On 25 December 2015 at 21:10, Colin Johnston <colinj () gt86car org uk> wrote:
why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse reports, normal slow speed network abuse is tolerated, but not high speed deliberate abuse albeit compromised machine
They do not speak the same language as you. They barely understand your complaint and you would not understand their reply (in chinese!) - or do you expect everyone to know english? Why does everyone expect the chinese to use Google Translate? Try it yourself before sending off your complaint in Mandarin... Regards, Baldur
Current thread:
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons, (continued)
- Re: Broadband Router Comparisons Jason Baugher (Dec 24)
- de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Daniel Corbe (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Stephen Satchell (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Lee (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Clayton Zekelman (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Hugo Slabbert (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake TR Shaw (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Andrew Kirch (Dec 25)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Jared Mauch (Dec 26)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 24)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 24)